能用继承的办法间接实现StringBuffer的clone。如果一个类中包含有StringBuffer类型对象或和StringBuffer相似类的对象,我们有两种选择:要么只能实现影子clone,要么就在类的clone()方法中加一句(假设是SringBuffer对象,而且变量名仍是unCA): o.unCA = new StringBuffer(unCA.toString()); //原来的是:o.unCA = (UnCloneA)unCA.clone();
还要知道的是除了基本数据类型能自动实现深度clone以外,String对象是一个例外,它clone后的表现好象也实现了深度clone,虽然这只是一个假象,但却大大方便了我们的编程。
JAVA中的指针,引用及对象的clone(6)
时间:2011-01-06 IBM 倪大鹏
Clone中String和StringBuffer的区别
应该说明的是,这里不是着重说明String和StringBuffer的区别,但从这个例子里也能看出String类的一些与众不同的地方。
下面的例子中包括两个类,CloneC类包含一个String类型变量和一个StringBuffer类型变量,并且实现了clone()方法。在StrClone类中声明了CloneC类型变量c1,然后调用c1的clone()方法生成c1的拷贝c2,在对c2中的String和StringBuffer类型变量用相应的方法改动之后打印结果:
package clone;
class CloneC implements Cloneable{
public String str;
public StringBuffer strBuff;
public Object clone(){
CloneC o = null;
try{
o = (CloneC)super.clone();
}catch(CloneNotSupportedException e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
return o;
}
}
public class StrClone {
public static void main(String[] a){
CloneC c1 = new CloneC();
c1.str = new String("initializeStr");
c1.strBuff = new StringBuffer("initializeStrBuff");
System.out.println("before clone,c1.str = "+ c1.str);
System.out.println("before clone,c1.strBuff = "+ c1.strBuff);
CloneC c2 = (CloneC)c1.clone();
c2.str = c2.str.substring(0,5);
c2.strBuff = c2.strBuff.append(" change strBuff clone");
System.out.println("=================================");
System.out.println("after clone,c1.str = "+ c1.str);
System.out.println("after clone,c1.strBuff = "+ c1.strBuff);
System.out.println("=================================");
System.out.println("after clone,c2.str = "+ c2.str);
System.out.println("after clone,c2.strBuff = "+ c2.strBuff);
}
}
/* RUN RESULT
before clone,c1.str = initializeStr
before clone,c1.strBuff = initializeStrBuff
=================================
after clone,c1.str = initializeStr
after clone,c1.strBuff = initializeStrBuff change strBuff clone
=================================
after clone,c2.str = initi
after clone,c2.strBuff = initializeStrBuff change strBuff clone
*
*/
打印的结果可以看出,String类型的变量好象已经实现了深度clone,因为对c2.str的改动并没有影响到c1.str!难道Java把Sring类看成了基本数据类型?其实不然,这里有一个小小的把戏,秘密就在于c2.str = c2.str.substring(0,5)这一语句!实质上,在clone的时候c1.str与c2.str仍然是引用,而且都指向了同一个String对象。但在执行c2.str = c2.str.substring(0,5)的 |